Lawyers should learn AI but must be aware of its ethical risks: Chief Justice Menon

Click HERE

Note opening with a BANG using an anecdote/eg

Such tools are obviously not bound by values like honesty and integrity, and can therefore provide wholly incorrect answers

one such case had already happened in Singapore. ...“There has been at least one case in which a self-represented person used ChatGPT to create submissions that included fabricated case law.

Harvey, an AI tool tailored to the legal field that can answer legal queries, summarise information, and prepare drafts of documents...“Generative AI tools will greatly enhance existing uses of AI in the law such as in legal research and the creation of legal documents. The current crop of tools are already highly adept at interpreting user queries and synthesising complex information.

AI has to be the tool, and not the workman itself

Qn: Should limits be placed on the development of artificial intelligence? (ACJC Prelim 2023)